{"id":1370,"date":"2015-03-06T07:01:24","date_gmt":"2015-03-06T07:01:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/labs.webfoundation.org\/id\/part-1-a-deeper-look-at-the-regional-open-data-workshop\/"},"modified":"2015-12-04T08:00:35","modified_gmt":"2015-12-04T08:00:35","slug":"part-1-a-deeper-look-at-the-regional-open-data-workshop","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/labs.webfoundation.org\/id\/part-1-a-deeper-look-at-the-regional-open-data-workshop\/","title":{"rendered":"Part 1: A deeper look at the Regional Open Data Agenda-Setting Workshop"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Regional Open Data Agenda-Setting Workshop<\/a>, hosted by the Web Foundation\u2019s Open Data Lab Jakarta, took place last 4\u20136 February 2015 in Jakarta, Indonesia. The workshop is part of the Harnessing Open Data to Achieve Development Results in Africa and Asia<\/a> project, conducted in partnership with the Open Data for Development Network<\/a>, and financially supported by the International Development Research Centre<\/a>.<\/p>\n

It was an event bursting with expertise – 492 years of work experience, collectively – with 34 participants from 11 countries across Asia-Pacific and from four other countries outside the region representing government, civil society, media and academia. It brought together experts, activists and advocates of open data for fruitful discussions on the current state of open data and inspiring its progress in the Asia-Pacific region.<\/p>\n

\"rw1\"<\/p>\n

Day 1: Ideal State of Open Data in the Region and Discussing the Open Data Barometer<\/h2>\n

There were a total of five sessions spanning the three days. The event was kicked off by an introduction to open data, the Web Foundation and the Open Data Labs, and explaining the purpose, idea and objectives framing the workshop.<\/p>\n

Following this was the historical scan, wherein participants mapped the key events in the development of open data in the region, dating back two decades. The resulting timeline and the presentations gave a clear portrait of the drastic rise of open data over the last five years, but only in certain sectors and countries.<\/p>\n

\"rw2\"<\/p>\n

Afterwards, a discourse on the Open Data Barometer<\/a> took place. Attendees discussed results, rankings and open data stories\u2014such as addressing supply, demand and accessibility, and understanding data trends. Representing the region\u2019s best performing country, Data and Information Programme<\/a> Manager for the New Zealand Government, Keitha Booth, gave valuable insight on how to ensure open data\u2019s potential is harnessed:<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019ve got a supply side and demand side in our work. And in the supply side we want to make sure that the data is regular and in open format, so that the users can be confident that they\u2019ll get it on a long-term basis. And on the demand side, we\u2019re working to\u2026find people to work with who want the data; we have a process for people to request it online. We\u2019re developing better relationships with groups representing different groups, like CSOs and researchers, statisticians, business communities, so all our work is based on high-value\u2014the demand that people want to use.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

At the other end of the spectrum, Myanmar \u2013 the lowest ranked country in the study – was co-represented by Information Matrix<\/a>\u2019s Thaung Su Nyein. Although not completely conceding to the results, he agrees that there are progress and improvements that could be had when treating open government data in Myanmar. He explains:<\/p>\n

\u201cMyanmar is ranked number 86 out of 86 countries, so it\u2019s never an agreeable position when your country is in the last, but I think there is some substance to that. (Like) the Myanmar government has been very slow on reforming and releasing data, even to journalists…I think it just shows that we need to transform, we need to radically change the way agencies treat data.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The variety of reactions to the study gave the Lab and representatives of the Web Foundation a melange of inputs to consider for future Open Data Barometer research. This includes points of reflection on the methodologies and indicators used. As an example, Nyein elaborates, there are times wherein planned and undertaken actions for improving open data impacts are not as successful or pronounced as intended:<\/p>\n

\u201cThat\u2026it\u2019s really hard listening to all the other civic tech communities present here\u2026you could tell that things don’t always work as advertised, even though we all mean very well and we try to do our very best, sometimes the impact isn\u2019t as we try to engineer it to be, and impact sometimes works on a magical way of its own. Sometimes you plan this and this\u2026(and instead) \u2018that\u2019 happens, but you just have to keep trying and hoping that one will stick.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Concluding this, the day ended with the victory circle. The voices in the room worked together to define the ideal states of open data in Asia:<\/p>\n